This Content Is Only For Subscribers
Waterproof jackets have long been essential for outdoor lovers and urban dwellers alike, shielding us from rain and wind. But a startling revelation is shaking up the industry: many of these jackets harbor per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), nicknamed “forever chemicals” for their stubborn refusal to break down. Once prized for their water-repelling magic, PFAS are now under fire as mounting evidence ties them to severe health risks—threatening everything from our immune defenses to our reproductive health. With consumers buzzing and experts sounding the alarm, brands are scrambling to adapt, making this a story that’s as urgent as it is unsettling.
These synthetic chemicals, woven into durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes or jacket membranes, keep you dry by shrugging off water, grease, and stains. Their downside? They don’t just vanish. PFAS linger in the environment and build up in our bodies, earning their “forever” label. The health toll is grim: studies link them to weakened immune systems, with research from the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology showing kids exposed to PFAS produce fewer antibodies after vaccines, leaving them prone to infections. The reproductive and developmental fallout is just as dire—decreased fertility, low birth weights, and delayed growth in children are all on the list, per the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Then there’s cancer: the EPA flags increased risks of kidney and testicular cancers, while high cholesterol and hormone disruption add to the growing rap sheet. Scientists warn the full scope of damage is still unfolding, but what’s clear is enough to rattle anyone pulling on their rain gear.
This mounting evidence has consumers reeling—and they’re not staying quiet. Online forums and social media are ablaze with frustration. “I trusted my jacket to keep me safe, not to poison me,” one hiker vented, a sentiment echoing across the outdoor community. Environmental watchdogs like Toxic-Free Future are piling on the pressure, with a spokesperson declaring, “The industry can’t keep gambling with our health when safer options are out there.” Health experts back the outcry, pointing to peer-reviewed studies—like one in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health tying PFAS to asthma and thyroid glitches—as proof the threat is real. The clamor is hitting the outdoor gear world hard, forcing a reckoning over a chemical once seen as a miracle worker.
Brands are feeling the heat, and some are stepping up. Household names like Arc’teryx, The North Face, and Columbia have leaned on PFAS for years to deliver top-notch waterproofing. But the tide is turning. Patagonia’s vowing to ditch PFAS by 2025, and REI’s already rolling out PFAS-free jackets. Not everyone’s on board, though—cheaper brands cling to PFAS for its low cost and reliability, while even big players wrestle with swapping out a chemical that’s tough to beat. The shift’s not just talk: California and New York are set to ban PFAS in clothing by 2025, lighting a fire under manufacturers to innovate or get left behind. It’s a race against time—and public opinion.
So what sets PFAS-laden jackets apart from their cleaner cousins? The PFAS versions excel at repelling water, thanks to their chemical backbone. PFAS-free options lean on alternatives like silicone sprays, wax coatings, or cutting-edge fabrics like Gore-Tex’s new PFAS-free expanded polyethylene (ePE) membrane. The catch? These substitutes might need a refresh after a few washes and may falter in a deluge, though brands like Fjällräven and Keen are narrowing that gap with savvy engineering. For consumers, it’s a trade-off: dodge the health risks or stick with peak performance. As one gear reviewer put it, “The PFAS-free stuff’s getting better, but it’s not quite there yet—give it a year or two.”
If you’ve already got a PFAS-coated jacket, don’t expect to rinse it clean—the stuff’s baked in. Experts say you can’t “detox” it, but you can limit the damage. Keep wearing it to avoid landfill leaching, wash it sparingly, and skip the dryer’s high heat, which can vaporize PFAS into the air. A base layer cuts skin contact, though everyday wear poses minimal absorption risk—production and disposal are the real culprits. Meanwhile, alternatives are gaining ground. Gore-Tex’s ePE fabric is popping up in Rapha gear, while Fjällräven’s wax blends and Keen’s silicone treatments offer solid, guilt-free options. The industry’s inching toward a cleaner future, but it’s not moving fast enough for everyone.
That’s where you come in. Want to dodge PFAS? Hunt for jackets tagged “PFAS-free” or “fluorine-free”—they’re out there if you look. Not seeing them from your go-to brand? Shoot them a message. Consumer pushback works—just ask Patagonia. For now, the PFAS saga is a wake-up call: gear meant to shield us can silently harm us instead. With health hazards stacking up and safer tech on the rise, the outdoor world’s at a crossroads. How it—and we—respond could redefine what it means to gear up and head out.
